1

The Pickup Place / Re: Quacky Neck PU for Super 3 Bridge PU?

« Last post by Mr. Lime on December 01, 2025, 06:12:49 AM »

I rather mean the kind of blooming of notes played usually associated with a Strat neck PU.
Not to be mistaken with the glassy SC sound, which I'm not after. The Air Norten does have that blooming effect I mean while the HFH is missing it - at least in this Gibson SG and the amps I tested it with.
So my resume is that bright pickups just sound thin in this guitar.

Several years ago I tried all kinds of phase switching, series and parallel wirings and how useful all of that is really depends on the guitar and the pickups used.
Usually I find series OoP wirings on the bridge PU more useful. I tend to dislike parallel wirings of humbuckers in itself.

As I already tried some very bright pickups, I'm afraid the Super 2 will disapoint me as it's probably kind of a high power Humbucker from Hell model.
What I really need in the SG are mids and only moderate bass and treble.

I like the recommendation of the EMG 81 since to my understanding the 81 always was ment to be in the neck postition and the 85 in the bridge. I always liked the 85 in the brdige more than those 81 but would rather try a 60 in the neck.
Don't know why would someone put it other way around as most guitars with EMGs are sold with 81/85 for bridge/neck..

If the Air Norton has too much bass in the neck spot (for me it would), LiquiFire is an option.

Cheers Stephan

I recently tried it with my Engl 580 preamp and the Air Norten performs quite well in the bass frequencies.
The Liquidfire and Gravity Storm are probably the best bets, see the technical comparison attached.

2

The Pickup Place / Re: Quacky Neck PU for Super 3 Bridge PU?

« Last post by darkbluemurder on December 01, 2025, 03:57:53 AM »

If the Air Norton has too much bass in the neck spot (for me it would), LiquiFire is an option.

Cheers Stephan

3

The Pickup Place / Re: Quacky Neck PU for Super 3 Bridge PU?

« Last post by gregr on November 30, 2025, 12:01:09 PM »

What do you mean by quack? The term is normally used to describe the tone created when combining single coils from distinct positions in parallel. You can get quack-adjacent with a single humbucker when you run the coils out of phase though I don’t imagine this is how you’re using it.

If you simply mean bright then the most obvious choice is a Super 2 since it seems clear you want high output. Otherwise the PAF Pro is the overall winner for a bright powerful neck pickup that doesn’t peel paint. I imagine the D Activator Neck is also a good option from the high output category.

I’m not certain dual resonance makes for a particularly bright pickup as the goal is to impart a more vocal quality by broadening out the midrange. Virtual Vintage, on the other hand, provides more output, allowing for fewer turns in order to retain more top-end.

Non-DiMarzio higher output recommendations with a decent amount of treble for the neck:
Seymour Duncan Screamin’ Demon or Perpetual Burn.  EMG 81 (active, but worthy of a mention).

4

The Pickup Place / Re: Quacky Neck PU for Super 3 Bridge PU?

« Last post by Mr. Lime on November 30, 2025, 07:12:35 AM »

Yesterday I installed the Air Norton and it's great fun to play. Sweep picking apreggios can be made with ease and lots of harmonics in single note playing. There might be a tad too much bass as with chords and high gain the lower notes sound a bit muddy and hight adjustments don't lead me to the right balance but overall it's a great improvement compared to the HFH, Bluesbucker and PAF Pro while to me it still has some quacky qualities. If it had the double cream colour I might would stick with the AN.
Heading into the right direction I'm interested in other A5 magnet Dimarzios, especially with dual resonance patent.
There's the FRED and Mo'Joe, which might be even more to my liking. Also the Gravity Storm (6,47 H) or Liquidfire (6,17 H)
 seem to be in the right ballpark, comparing the inductance of the AN (6,27 H). The GS seems to have similar wounds to the AN but using the virtual vintage slugs and hex pole pieces when comparing the technical specs.

5

The Pickup Place / Re: Quacky Neck PU for Super 3 Bridge PU?

« Last post by Mr. Lime on November 27, 2025, 07:11:45 AM »

Hi Stephan,

thanks for replying!
I recently put in the Bluesbucker and although I like it better than the PAF Pro, it doesn't fit the guitar that well. I think it's too thin sounding in it. I loved it in one of my Jackson Soloists but didn't care for it in a Charvel 750XL - really depends on the guitars.
In my experience it's often a problem with SG models, that they are hungry for more mids. The attack of the PAF Pro was nice. Since it's not in the guitar anymore I can't exactly tell what was missing - recalling I would say bass frequencies.

Yesterday I received a guitar with an old X2n from 1979 in it. I might try this in the bridge before I order the Super 3. When I checked for a neck pickup suggestion I found the D Activator X neck pickup, which does look promising on paper! I would have to check the none X neck version in one of my 7 Strings but the website says it has very little bass like the previous pickups I didn't liked that much.
I had almost only good experience with rail pickups. The Tone Zone S, Super D S, Ibanez V5 and most of my Bill Lawrence pickups were neat. The Haven Omnia set was unusable for me.
Isn't string pull less on rail pickups in general? So they should deliver a bit more sustain in theory.

The Full Shred wouldn't fit colourwise with the final Dimarzio I would probably use in cream and I had hard times liking the bridge version in the guitars I used it. I'm also afraid it might have too little bass as the PAF Pro and HFH.
I might try some bridge pickups like the Tone Zone, Norton or Air Norton I have left over. The Air Norton in an Ibanez J Custom I sold recently was disappointing for me but I didn't like the whole guitar so I haven't experimented much with it.
Great results I had in the past with a SH-4 and Al DiMeola Bridge version in the neck position of various guitars so a Norton might do the trick as well.

6

The Pickup Place / Re: Quacky Neck PU for Super 3 Bridge PU?

« Last post by darkbluemurder on November 21, 2025, 08:58:52 AM »

For a neck pickup to partner with the Super 3 I would probably go for the hottest model that still "makes sense" somehow. Super 2 with the Ray mod (remove the screws in one coil) should work well. Quacky, however, it is not.

If you want something quackier/brighter than the PAF Pro, the Seymour Duncan Full Shred neck (SH-10n) does it. It is lower output than the PAF Pro, though.

Bluesbucker is nice as well but also lower output than the PAF Pro. Its biggest asset is that the split mode does not drop in output compared to the series mode. If you already have one it does not hurt to try.

When you say "the PAF Pro feels ... a little generic" what exactly do you mean by that? What exactly do you want more or less of? That may be helpful. E.g. if you want a more singing tone, Breed neck would be it.

Cheers Stephan

7

The Pickup Place / Re: Which Pickup Features Which Technique

« Last post by darkbluemurder on November 21, 2025, 08:47:55 AM »

Agree that it would impossible on standard sized bobbins. Never seen either the bridge or the neck model and cannot judge whether the bridge pickup may have a deeper than usual bobbin.

My guess is that the neck pickup is wound with AWG PE 43 and the bridge pickup with some weird in-between gauge. I know that BKP for example use 42.5 polysol wire on some models.

Cheers Stephan

8

Everything you wanted to know about .... / Re: Chopper/Chopper T

« Last post by darkbluemurder on November 21, 2025, 05:14:27 AM »

Now on to the regular Chopper. I had this in two different strats in the bridge together with an Area 58 in the middle and an Area 67 in the neck. The main difference is that in one the volume pot was 250k whereas it was 500k in the other. I prefer to run it with 500k.

Keep in mind that I am not a vintage strat pickup fan usually, and definitely not a fan of a traditional single coil in the bridge position - too icepicky for my taste. I was always looking for something beefier in the bridge but without the usual compromise to the bridge + middle position.

The set up I have now is as follows: 500k audio volume pot, 500k audio tone for positions 2-5, 500k audio tone only for position 1 (bridge only). No coil split in position 2 (bridge + middle in parallel). No series option - not really necessary with the Chopper in the bridge. 5-way 4 level switch. I use a 560k resistor to bring down the load to approx. 270k for positions 3-5. Note: position 2 keeps the 500k load.

Result: a fat but present bridge tone without any trace of icepick, very hot PAF like. Volume balance to the single coils is great. The bridge + middle position sounds excellent and does not feel like a compromise at all. The guitar also offers a setting that gives bridge + neck which sounds excellent as well.

In summary the Chopper is a great option for anyone wanting a fatter sound in the bridge position of a strat that is routed for SSS which still sounds great together with the middle single coil.

Cheers Stephan

9

Everything you wanted to know about .... / Chopper/Chopper T

« Last post by darkbluemurder on November 20, 2025, 05:35:47 AM »

Surprised that there is no thread on these yet so I will start.

Chopper T

This is probably the most versatile telecaster bridge pickup I ever encountered. With the coils in series it resembles a hot PAF type pickup - healthy output but not over the top, enough bite to cut through, solid, tight bass and vocal but not overbearing midrange. This is with a 500k volume pot. With the coils in parallel and a load of approx. 250k it resembles a powerful single coil, even though the bass is not quite as tight. It also sound quite good with just one coil in operation but of course it is no longer humcancelling then.

Comment on the strat variant to follow.

Cheers Stephan

10

The Pickup Place / Re: Which Pickup Features Which Technique

« Last post by RayBarbeeMusic on November 19, 2025, 10:38:49 PM »

Quote from a forum member on the mylespaul forum on the Al di Meola set:

Al DiMeola Neck (DP201): output=230mV, treble=6, mids=4, bass=6, DC=10.87K.
Al DiMeola Bridge (DP202): output=275, treble=5, mids=8, bass=8, DC=10.84.

The magnets are AL5, they are not airbuckers, and the neck pickup has dual-resonance coils.

From these specs it looks like the neck pickup is wound with a wire thinner than 42 AWG - otherwise the rated outputs do not make sense given both models use the same magnet.

Neither are PE42.  Try to fit 10.84k of PE42 on a pair of humbucker bobbins, I dare you!