1
Everything you wanted to know about .... / Re: The AT-1
« Last post by corypheus on September 22, 2026, 09:53:51 AM »I have moved my AT-1 from guitar to guitar, always finding something lacking in the end - mostly too much bloated midrange.
That is until I put it in a bolt-on Junior type guitar with a Paulownia body and maple/rosewood neck. It replaced a Mo' Joe which was fine but lacked the substance on the higher notes. I had thought long and hard about what to put in there and initially thought "not the AT-1" as I did not think it would be a good fit. But I did - and I am glad I did. The guitar loves the AT-1. It filled the missing frequencies nicely to make the high notes fat. The bottom end is not overly tight but not flubby either. And, finally, it does not sound nasal in this guitar. Like the JB, the AT-1 appears to be more sensitive than the average humbucker to the guitar it is in.
It is the only pickup in that guitar, which has a volume and a tone control (both 500k audio) and a 3-way toggle wired for series/parallel/single coil.
Cheers Stephan
I'm sure you know this even better than me, but I remember reading that AT1 on a 500k vol pot was basically designed to sound like a TB4 loaded with 250k volume pot. I always approached this as the "bible" and simply always mated AT1 with 1000k volume pot (I don't use tone pots), and had great success. It's still smoother sounding than a JB, but the bigger volume pot really opens the congested bloaty midrange, at least in my experience. This was mostly in two Les Pauls, so shorter scale heavier guitars (mahogany made if you tend to believe body woods have an impact on the end sound, fwiw).

Recent Posts